<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/mmm2008-05-08_20.17/rsspretty.aspx?rssquery=en-US;http%3a%2f%2feentmoot.spaces.live.com%2fcategory%2fComputers%2band%2bInternet%2ffeed.rss' version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:msn="http://schemas.microsoft.com/msn/spaces/2005/rss" xmlns:live="http://schemas.microsoft.com/live/spaces/2006/rss" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Entmoot: Computers and Internet</title><description /><link>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/?_c11_BlogPart_BlogPart=blogview&amp;_c=BlogPart&amp;partqs=catComputers%2band%2bInternet</link><language>en-US</language><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:35:24 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:35:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Microsoft Spaces v1.1</generator><docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs><ttl>60</ttl><cf:parentRSS>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/blog/feed.rss</cf:parentRSS><live:type>blogcategory</live:type><live:identity><live:id>6929087957546693616</live:id><live:alias>eentmoot</live:alias></live:identity><cf:listinfo><cf:group ns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/live/spaces/2006/rss" element="typelabel" label="Type" /><cf:group ns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/live/spaces/2006/rss" element="tag" label="Tag" /><cf:group element="category" label="Category" /><cf:sort element="pubDate" label="Date" data-type="date" default="true" /><cf:sort element="title" label="Title" data-type="string" /><cf:sort ns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" element="comments" label="Comments" data-type="number" /></cf:listinfo><item><title>Genealogy, Technology, and Latter-day Saints</title><link>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!122.entry</link><description>Gordon B. Hinckley is hopeful that technology will fix the problem of
ordinance duplication. The LDS Church is doing ordinance work for
thousands of dead ancestors every year. Proxies perform baptisms and
other ordinances for dead ancestors. The Church records names, dates,
and places in an attempt to record who has been baptized and who has
not. Millions of members worldwide submit names of the deceased. The
problem is many names are submitted multiple times and consequently
work is duplicated for those names. The Church is developing a
technology that will allow names to be grafted into a central family
tree. Patrons of the system will be able to find out if they are
duplicating the work or not before they actually perform the work.
President Hinckley is hopeful that this will solve the problem of
ordinance duplication.&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=6929087957546693616&amp;page=RSS%3a+Genealogy%2c+Technology%2c+and+Latter-day+Saints&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=eentmoot.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=eentmoot"&gt;</description><comments>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!122.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!122.entry</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:50:00 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!122/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!122.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2006-04-14T19:13:41Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>Microsoft's Monopoly Grows</title><link>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!120.entry</link><description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman" color="#000000" size=3&gt;Microsoft will have a more complete monopoly because of Apple’s new Intel machines. The dual core Intel machine 800 D processor supports native virtual machine support. This means you could really run any OS on them just fine. You could boot into OSX or boot into Windows XP. Now corporate America will be able to enjoy Apple’s slick designs with the dominant Windows XP software and suites. Apple and Microsoft will both benefit from this new union. Microsoft’s only competitor in the home and corporate PC market will be Linux. Other competitors will exist for servers but in the most profitable market Microsoft will have a more complete monopoly on operating system sales.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=6929087957546693616&amp;page=RSS%3a+Microsoft's+Monopoly+Grows&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=eentmoot.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=eentmoot"&gt;</description><comments>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!120.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!120.entry</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:03:06 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!120/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!120.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2006-04-06T19:03:06Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>Patent Law</title><link>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!119.entry</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Today’s business in the computer science space is about
patents. Without the patent your product is unmarketable. It is unmarketable
for two reasons: first, another company might submit a patent for your design
and force you out of the market and second, your product could be copied and
distributed freely to everyone in the world. In interviews I’ve had with
Microsoft and small business entrepreneurs the talk has always included
patents. Small businesses prize their few patents to be their source of revenue
and take their profits higher. Microsoft and other large companies often
measure a team’s progress and production by how many patents they produce in a
year. Because of the distributable nature of bits on a disk, it is important to
devise means to protect a creator’s fair payment. The bottom line is that
ownership is an abstract idea and in computer science ownership needs to be
clearly defined to ensure that the business is profitable. &lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=6929087957546693616&amp;page=RSS%3a+Patent+Law&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=eentmoot.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=eentmoot"&gt;</description><comments>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!119.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!119.entry</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:13:28 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!119/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!119.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2006-03-28T20:14:23Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>Google vs Government</title><link>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!118.entry</link><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is protecting pornographers who are targeting children. In January of this year the U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales demanded that google share a general list of terms used on their search engine. Google refused. Google claims that even though this would not violate any specific person's privacy that obeying government subpoenas could lead to privacy infringement in the future. The subpoena they refused, however, does not violate any person's privacy. I would not be surprised if google is embarrassed at how they themselves are facilitators in giving pornography to children. Recently google was sued by pornography companies who claimed &lt;i&gt;google images&lt;/i&gt; was caching and indexing their copyrighted material. The pornography companies understand how people are getting to their images. Google also understands what images their search engine delivers and they are very reluctant in sharing that information to our government.&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=6929087957546693616&amp;page=RSS%3a+Google+vs+Government&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=eentmoot.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=eentmoot"&gt;</description><comments>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!118.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!118.entry</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:46:23 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!118/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!118.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2006-03-14T19:46:23Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>Women in Computing</title><link>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!117.entry</link><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eventually we will see more women programmers in the United States. I know many women computer scientists. They are often the brightest computer programmers in their classes. My friend Maria from Ukraine explained to me that in the Ukraine the computer science discipline is split evenly between men and women. This is likely to happen in the United States as more women see computing as a viable career. The ability to work from home is especially convenient for women who plan on raising children. There are many who believe that there is a fundamental difference between men and women that make women avoid programming. I readily agree that there are fundamental differences between the psychology men and women. However, I do not believe that these differences make one more likely to be a programmer than the other. As society progresses, I think the United States will mirror the trends of European countries where both men and women are programmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=6929087957546693616&amp;page=RSS%3a+Women+in+Computing&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=eentmoot.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=eentmoot"&gt;</description><comments>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!117.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!117.entry</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:29:19 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!117/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://eentmoot.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!602910C91701F3F0!117.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2006-03-02T20:29:19Z</dcterms:modified></item></channel></rss>